Fiwind Card vs Agrotoken

In our editorial rating Agrotoken leads (3.5 vs 3.0). Neither wins across the board: weigh the points above against your use case before choosing between Fiwind Card and Agrotoken.

Fiwind Card Agrotoken
Tier C B
Rating ★ 3.0 ★ 3.5
Estimated net annual cost €0 €0
Account fee Not disclosed Free
Multi-currency ARS, USD, BRL, BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, BNB, DAI, SOL No (single currency)
Network Mastercard
ATM withdrawal not declared not declared
Fund custody Custodial (platform holds funds) Custodial (platform holds funds)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries LATAM LATAM · 3+ countries
Regulator CNV (Comisión Nacional de Valores) None
Segment B2C B2B
IBAN condiviso
Outbound transfers to third-party IBANs No
Utility direct billing No
SEPA direct debit (SDD) No
On-chain crypto withdrawal Yes
Interest on balance 0%
OAM Italy registration No
Regions LATAM LATAM
Licences & safety CNV PSAV N°75 (Financewind S.A.) None
Fiwind Card 3.0/5 · Tier C
Agrotoken 3.5/5 · Tier B

Frequently asked questions

Fiwind Card vs Agrotoken: which is better?

In our editorial rating Agrotoken leads (3.5 vs 3.0). Neither wins across the board: weigh the points above against your use case before choosing between Fiwind Card and Agrotoken.

Which is cheaper, Fiwind Card or Agrotoken?

On the standard spending profile Fiwind Card has the lowest net annual cost: €0 versus €0 for Agrotoken.

Is Fiwind Card custodial or self-custody?

Fiwind Card is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while Agrotoken is custodial.