Zerion vs Phantom

On coverage Zerion is broader (50 chains vs 5). The right wallet is the one you will actually use: assess your flow first (holding vs frequent use), then the spec sheet.

Zerion Phantom
Tier A A
Rating ★ 4.2 ★ 4.4
Fund custody Self-custody (funds in your control) Self-custody (funds in your control)
Type Software (hot wallet) Software (hot wallet)
Source code Partly open-source Partly open-source
Bitcoin-only No No
Supported chains Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, BNB Chain, zkSync, Scroll, Solana Solana, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Bitcoin
Built-in swap Yes Yes
Built-in staking Yes Yes
dApp browser Yes Yes
WalletConnect Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes
Built-in fiat on-ramp Yes Yes
Security audits Trail of Bits, Peckshield, Cube53, Secfault Security Kudelski Security, Least Authority
Segment B2C B2C
Recovery Seed phrase 12 parole (BIP-39)
Regions US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM, MENA, Africa US, EU/EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM, MENA, Africa
Licences & safety Nessuna (wallet self-custody non-custodial) Nessuna (wallet self-custody non-custodial)
Zerion 4.2/5 · Tier A
Phantom 4.4/5 · Tier A

Frequently asked questions

Zerion vs Phantom: which is better?

On coverage Zerion is broader (50 chains vs 5). The right wallet is the one you will actually use: assess your flow first (holding vs frequent use), then the spec sheet.

Is Zerion custodial or self-custody?

Zerion is self-custody: you keep the keys, while Phantom is self-custody.