Current vs Liminal Custody
Current and Liminal Custody compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. In our editorial rating Liminal Custody leads (4.7 vs 3.5). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
| Current | Liminal Custody | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | B | S |
| Rating | ★ 3.5 | ★ 4.7 |
| Service type | Stablecoin infrastructure | Stablecoin infrastructure |
| Pricing model | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Customer type | Platforms | — |
| Fund custody | Custodial (platform holds funds) | Self-custody (funds in your control) |
| Supported countries | US | EEA, UK, US, APAC · 12+ countries |
| Regulator | Depositi presso banche partner (Choice Financial Group, Cross River Bank), Member FDIC | FSRA (ADGM), VARA (Dubai) |
| OAM Italy registration | No | No |
| Segment | B2C | B2B |
| Per-card fee | — | $0.00 virtual · $0.00 physical |
| Stablecoins | — | USDC, USDT |
| Custody model | — | MPC |
| KYC | — | Full |
| Past incidents | — | WazirX $230M hack (July 2024) — Liminal was the custodian provider for the compromised multisig wallet. Attackers exploited UI/data mismatch to upgrade Safe contract. |
| Regions | US | EU/EEA, UK, US, APAC |
| Licences & safety | FSP (ADGM), TCSP (Hong Kong), in-principle VARA (Dubai) |
Frequently asked questions
Current vs Liminal Custody: which is better?
Current and Liminal Custody compete in the same bracket: coverage, certifications and integration time-to-market decide it. In our editorial rating Liminal Custody leads (4.7 vs 3.5). For a serious B2B comparison request custom pricing from both: public terms are only the starting point.
Is Current custodial or self-custody?
Current is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while Liminal Custody is self-custody.