Slash Card vs Paynetics

For spending abroad FX markup matters, and Paynetics does better (0% vs 1%). In our editorial rating Paynetics leads (4.4 vs 4.0). Neither wins across the board: weigh the points above against your use case before choosing between Slash Card and Paynetics.

Slash Card Paynetics
Tier A A
Rating ★ 4.0 ★ 4.4
Estimated net annual cost €0
Account fee Free Free
Network Visa
ATM withdrawal Free not declared
Fund custody Custodial (platform holds funds) Custodial (platform holds funds)
KYC Full Full
Supported countries US EEA, UK · 31+ countries
Segment B2B B2B
IBAN condiviso · BG, UK
Multi-currency Yes · 5 currencies
Outbound transfers to third-party IBANs No
Utility direct billing No
SEPA direct debit (SDD) No
On-chain crypto withdrawal No
SEPA transfer Free
Interest on balance 0%
Regulator BNB (Bulgaria) + FCA (UK)
OAM Italy registration No
Regions US EU/EEA, UK
Licences & safety Money Services Business (FinCEN) EMI
Slash Card 4.0/5 · Tier A
Paynetics 4.4/5 · Tier A

Frequently asked questions

Slash Card vs Paynetics: which is better?

For spending abroad FX markup matters, and Paynetics does better (0% vs 1%). In our editorial rating Paynetics leads (4.4 vs 4.0). Neither wins across the board: weigh the points above against your use case before choosing between Slash Card and Paynetics.

Which is cheaper, Slash Card or Paynetics?

On the standard spending profile Paynetics has the lowest net annual cost: €0 versus — for Slash Card.

Is Slash Card custodial or self-custody?

Slash Card is custodial: funds are held by the platform, while Paynetics is custodial.

Which is better for spending abroad?

For foreign-currency spending Paynetics wins, with the lowest FX markup: 0%.