Raydium
Raydium
Data verified on unchanged since the sources
Worth it if you trade on Solana and want a self-custody DEX with a hybrid AMM and orderbook, $813M TVL and meme-coin launches via LaunchLab.
Avoid it if you operate outside Solana or weigh past incidents: it's Solana-only and suffered a hack in 2022.
Raydium is a Solana DEX with a hybrid AMM and order-book model, around $813M in TVL and meme-coin launch features via LaunchLab. Its drawbacks include a 2022 hack of roughly $4.4M and full dependence on the Solana network.
Data & conditions
| Liquidity model | AMM |
|---|---|
| Maker / Taker fee | 0.01% / 1% |
| Markets | Spot |
| Supported chains | Solana |
| TVL (as of Jun 13) | $1B |
| 24h volume | $435M |
| Native token | RAY |
| Fund custody | Non-custodial (funds in your wallet) |
| Supported wallets | Phantom, Solflare, Backpack, Ledger |
| Audits | Kudelski Security (Q2 2021), OtterSec (Q3 2022 - CLMM/staking), MadShield/OShield (Q2 2023 - AMM; Q1 2024 - CP-swap), Halborn (Q4 2024; Q2 2025), Sec3 (Q3 2025; Q2 2026) |
| Governance | DAO + RAY token (governance + fee incentives) |
| KYC | Full |
| Supported countries | US, EEA, APAC, LATAM, MENA, AFRICA · 200+ countries |
| Regulator | None |
| Segment | B2C |
| MiCA / License status | None (decentralized protocol) DEX Solana |
Strengths
- AMM + orderbook ibrido; $813M TVL; meme coin launching (LaunchLab).
- Self-custody: funds stay in your wallet — the platform cannot touch them.
- Permissionless and decentralized: no approval needed to operate.
- Public security audits.
Weaknesses
- Hack 2022; only Solana.
- Full KYC required: verified identity, zero pseudonymity.
- Subject to regulation (DEX Solana): reporting to authorities and freezes on order.
Verdict
For the mainstream user protection is the bare minimum of a DEX: no regulator, no guarantees, self-held keys. The 2022 hack of roughly $4.4M remains a precedent that weighs, and full dependence on Solana ties operation to network uptime. The high grade rewards market position, not consumer safety.
From a crypto-native angle Raydium delivers: a non-custodial DEX on Solana with a hybrid AMM-plus-order-book model, around $813M in TVL and meme-coin launches via LaunchLab, with on-chain settlement, no KYC and full fund control. A trustless infrastructure deeply embedded in the Solana ecosystem; the 2022 hack and exclusive dependence on Solana are the factors holding its grade back.
Promp's editorial rating based on real fees and net annual cost. Promp reviews third-party products independently.
"Sovereignty" rating: score computed on privacy/anonymity (30%), fund control (20%), censorship resistance (20%), trustless/auditability (20%) and costs (10%). Same data, different weights.
Reputation
What happened to people who used Raydium, and what users say. External signals: they do not feed the promp.it rating.
Incidents & regulatory actions
Notable incidentsDocumented events with consequences still open. Each entry carries a source and a date.
-
Hack / funds theft Severe $4M ✓ resolved
Pool admin account key compromised: eight pools drained for about 4.4 million dollars. No contract flaw — it was the Pool Owner authority. Compensation actually carried out: claim portal open until 14 May 2023, 100% of principal returned on three pools and 90% on the other six
On 16 December 2022 at 10:12 UTC an attacker began removing liquidity from Raydium using the **Pool Owner (admin)** account of the Liquidity Pool V4 program. The technical point, and Raydium writes it in its own post-mortem, is that **there was no vulnerability in the contracts**: the attacker held the private key of the administrative authority, most likely through trojan-type malware on the machine holding it. With that key they called a fee-withdrawal function and drained **eight constant-product pools** for roughly **4.4 million dollars** in total, in RAY, stSOL, whETH, USDC, SOL, UXP, ZBC and USDT. Developers shipped a patch within hours, blocking any further reach into the other pools. The recovery attempt failed: Raydium publicly offered a 10% bounty plus the stolen RAY balance, and the attacker returned nothing. At that point the protocol did the only thing left, and saw it through: governance authorised the use of buyback revenues and team token allocations to reimburse liquidity providers, against a snapshot of LP balances taken at the moment of the exploit. The **claim portal** stayed open until **14 May 2023 at 23:59 UTC** and returned **100% of the principal** lost on RAY-USDC, RAY-SOL and RAY-USDT, and **90%** on SOL-USDC, SOL-USDT, stSOL-USDC, ETH-USDC, UXP-USDC and ZBC-USDC. Whatever went unclaimed returned to the Buyback Treasury. Stated precisely, because the difference matters: this is not a promise of a refund, it is a refund made and closed — but not whole for everyone, six pools out of nine recovered nine tenths.
↗ source -
Hack / funds theft Moderate $1M ● open
Five pools of the old AMM V3 program, retired in 2021 but never switched off, drained for 1.34 million dollars with a fake one-unit LP token. Raydium committed to covering it all from the treasury: as of today that is a declared commitment, not a verified refund
On 10 June 2026 an attacker withdrew **1.34 million dollars** — 150,177 RAY, 5,603 SOL and 893,700 USDC — from **five pools** of the **AMM V3** program, the automated market maker version Raydium had **retired in 2021**. RAY-SOL and USDC-RAY were among the pools hit. The flaw is of a simplicity that explains why years of audits are not enough when old code stays alive: on withdrawal the legacy program checked the *amount* of LP tokens but **not the address of the mint** they came from. The attacker created an arbitrary SPL mint with no link to any real pool, issued **a single unit** of it and called the old contract's withdraw function, bypassing the proportion checks and taking the entire liquidity. No key compromised, no current contract touched. The official Raydium Infra account acknowledged it the same day: «Raydium is aware of an exploit involving unauthorized removal of liquidity from its legacy AMM V3 program which was previously phased out in 2021. No current users of Raydium are affected by this exploit or would have been able to interact with these pools through the UI». The company stated that **the treasury will fully cover** the losses of the liquidity providers left in those pools, and opened a security review. ⚠️ This is what keeps the incident open: four months on, **no source, Raydium included, has published confirmation that the refunds were actually paid** — no timeline was disclosed at the time of the announcement. The usual rule applies: a promise of a refund is not a refund, and until the repayment is stated in the past tense the incident stays unresolved. The 2022 precedent, where Raydium did see compensation through, counts in its favour but does not replace verification.
↗ source
verified on
FAQ
Is Raydium truly decentralized?
Raydium is a non-custodial decentralized exchange: funds stay in your wallet. Liquidity model: AMM (CLMM). Governance token: RAY.
Which blockchains does Raydium support?
Raydium is available on Solana.
What is Raydium's TVL?
Raydium's Total Value Locked is about $1B (snapshot 2026-06-13). The figure is dynamic: check the live value on DefiLlama.
What are Raydium's fees?
Raydium's trading fees range 0.01% – 1%. On top of these there are on-chain gas fees, which vary with network congestion.
Does Raydium support perpetuals and leverage?
Raydium does not offer perpetuals. It supports spot token swaps.
Sources
- Official service page Liquidity model · TVL · Blockchain · Fees · +7 Data verified on Jun 14, 2026
- docs.raydium.io Supported wallets Data verified on Jun 14, 2026
- github.com Security audit Data verified on Jun 14, 2026
- quicknode.com Legal name · Company type Data verified on Jun 14, 2026
Show 4 more sources
- trustpilot.com Trustpilot reviews Data verified on Jun 14, 2026
- blog.pumpparade.com Third-party audit · Bug bounty Data verified on Jun 13, 2026
- dex.web3-gas.com 24h volume Data verified on Jun 13, 2026
- insidecryptoreview.com Founders · Governance · Past incidents Data verified on Jun 13, 2026